Data & notes
| Company | Employed | Open | Employed per open role |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | 317 | 6 | 52.8× |
| NVIDIA | 33 | 10 | 3.3× |
| Meta | 24 | 32 | 0.75× |
Read the multiple first
Ask for people on the measured wires, not a broader uncut list. Keep the request inside the companies and titles already shown.
Key takeaway · How to cite
Who employs vs who is hiring for Platform Engineer, host by host?
Read the ledger first: employed and open for each host, as of 2026-11-07 PT.
| Host | Employed | Open |
|---|---|---|
| IBM | 317 | 6 (low open-role count — ratio is volatile) |
| NVIDIA | 33 | 10 |
| Meta | 24 | 32 |
Get the named Platform Engineer list behind this table
Take the named list for the employers shown here. Leave the companies and the spelled-out titles as they are.
How do bench depth and open-role share compare for Platform Engineer?
Ratio lead IBM 52.8× (317 employed / 6 open) (see ratio chart above); bench lead IBM 317; open lead Meta 32.
Data & notes
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| IBM | 317 |
| NVIDIA | 33 |
| Meta | 24 |
Data & notes
| Name | Value | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Meta | 32 | 66.7% |
| NVIDIA | 10 | 20.8% |
| IBM | 6 | 12.5% |
Absolute employed beside opens: ratio lead IBM, bench lead IBM
The two rankings can diverge: bench volume and door density are different decisions.
Data & notes
| Category | Employed | Open roles |
|---|---|---|
| IBM | 317 | 6 |
| NVIDIA | 33 | 10 |
| Meta | 24 | 32 |
What it means for Platform Engineer employed vs open: what to do this week / how to use it
For door density this week: prefer the IBM multiple at 52.8× (317 employed / 6 open).
- For bench volume: prefer the IBM pool of 317 employed.
- For live reqs: prefer Meta's 32 captured open roles.
- IBM: low open-role count — ratio is volatile; do not brief off the multiple alone.
Open roles not captured stay off the ratio
Every host in this cut has open roles on the record, so each one is on the ratio.
Coverage notes
Every host in this cut has open roles on the record, so each one is on the ratio. A host whose open roles were not captured would be listed without a bar.
There is no five-host peer-pack ladder here: the comparison is employed per open role on one seat.
As of 2026-11-07 PT · Source: Metix AI
Notes & method
Methodology
Employed counts Platform Engineer on the company homepage record at 2026-11-07 PT. Open is the active posting count for that same title family. An open cell of 0 is uncaptured, not a claim of no demand. Source: Metix AI.
FAQ
- Does an uncaptured Platform Engineer host get a bar?
- On this Platform Engineer page, a host with uncaptured open roles is listed and gets no ratio bar. A 0 in the open cell means the postings were not captured.
- Is the Platform Engineer page a peer-pack ladder?
- No. This page divides employed Platform Engineer by captured open roles. Uncaptured hosts are excluded from the multiple.
- Who leads the Platform Engineer multiple?
- Lead with IBM 52.8× (317 employed / 6 open) when you name the top multiple. Read it as of 2026-11-07 PT.
- Where do the Platform Engineer figures come from?
- Employed and open cells were measured as of 2026-11-07 PT. Metix AI published the table.
Request the Platform Engineer open-req list
Name the destination wire you want covered when you ask for the list. Keep the title family this page counted.
Optional: try Mira