All reports
solutions engineering peer pack · five company records · 2026

Five Solutions Engineer (security vendors) benches on one date: inside the 464-profile peer pack

Okta leads at 258 (55.6% of the 464-person pack in the security vendors cut) against Palo Alto Networks at 120. As of 2026-11-13 PT.

As-of 2026-11-13 PT Published by Metix AI Collection series
How large is this peer pack?

How large is this peer pack?

464
pack total
five records added
258
Okta
pack anchor
19
Fortinet
tail
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 55.6% 25.9% 10.3% Okta 258 (55.6%) Palo Alto Networks 120 (25.9%) Zscaler 48 (10.3%) CrowdStrike 19 (4.1%) Fortinet 19 (4.1%) Solutions Engineer pack share profiles · As of 2026-11-13 PT 0% 30% 60% 90% 55.6% 25.9% Okta 258 (55.6%) Palo Alto Networks 120 (25.9%) Zscaler 48 (10.3%) CrowdStrike 19 (4.1%) Fortinet 19 (4.1%) Solutions Engineer pack share profiles · As of 2026-11-13 PT Solutions Engineer pack share of 464: Okta 258 (55.6%), Palo Alto Networks 120 (25.9%), Zscaler 48 (10.3%), CrowdStrike 19 (4.1%), Fortinet 19 (4.1%). As of 2026-11-13 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Solutions Engineer pack share of 464. As of 2026-11-13 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Data & notes
Okta 258 (55.6%), Palo Alto Networks 120 (25.9%), Zscaler 48 (10.3%), CrowdStrike 19 (4.1%), Fortinet 19 (4.1%).
NameValueShare
Okta25855.6%
Palo Alto Networks12025.9%
Zscaler4810.3%
CrowdStrike194.1%
Fortinet194.1%
Named list

Compare the five benches

The named list covers the companies and titles on this page. Keep the request inside the companies and titles already shown.

Named list

Get the named list behind these 464 Solutions Engineers

Ask for people on the measured wires, not a broader uncut list. The page already fixes the companies and the titles.

Key takeaway · How to cite
Which benches rank where?

Which benches rank where?

The benches run from Okta at 258 down to Fortinet at 19.

Okta Palo Alto Networks Zscaler CrowdStrike Fortinet 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 258 120 48 19 19 Solutions Engineer peer pack profiles · As of 2026-11-13 PT Okta Palo Alto Networks Zscaler CrowdStrike Fortinet 0 100 200 300 258 120 48 19 19 Solutions Engineer peer pack profiles · As of 2026-11-13 PT Solutions Engineer bench contrast, highest to lowest: Okta 258, Palo Alto Networks 120, Zscaler 48, CrowdStrike 19, Fortinet 19. As of 2026-11-13 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Solutions Engineer bench contrast, highest to lowest. As of 2026-11-13 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Data & notes
Okta 258, Palo Alto Networks 120, Zscaler 48, CrowdStrike 19, Fortinet 19.
NameValue
Okta258
Palo Alto Networks120
Zscaler48
CrowdStrike19
Fortinet19
Headcount vs share: who leads?

Absolute headcount vs share — who leads? Anchor Okta

Absolute headcount and share % can diverge: who is largest versus who holds the pack.

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Okta Palo Alto Networks Zscaler CrowdStrike Fortinet 258 120 48 19 19 55.6 25.9 10.3 4.1 4.1 Headcount Pack share % Solutions Engineer: headcount vs pack share % As of 2026-11-13 PT 0 100 200 300 Okta Palo Alto Network s Zscaler CrowdSt rike Fortinet 258 120 48 19 19 55.6 25.9 10.3 4.1 4.1 Headcount Pack share % Solutions Engineer: headcount vs pack share % As of 2026-11-13 PT Absolute headcount beside pack share % for Solutions Engineer. Anchor Okta 258 (55.6%); tail Fortinet 19 (4.1%). As of 2026-11-13 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Absolute headcount beside pack share % for Solutions Engineer. As of 2026-11-13 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Data & notes
Anchor Okta 258 (55.6%); tail Fortinet 19 (4.1%).
CategoryHeadcountPack share %
Okta25855.6
Palo Alto Networks12025.9
Zscaler4810.3
CrowdStrike194.1
Fortinet194.1
How concentrated is the pack?

How concentrated: top two / mid / tail?

Top two hold 378/464 (81.5%); mid 67; tail 19.

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 81.5% 14.4% Okta+Palo Alto Networks 378 (81.5%) Zscaler+CrowdStrike 67 (14.4%) Fortinet 19 (4.1%) Solutions Engineer concentration (top2 / mid / tail) profiles · As of 2026-11-13 PT 0% 30% 60% 90% 81.5% 14.4% Okta+Palo Alto Networks 378 (81.5%) Zscaler+CrowdStrike 67 (14.4%) Fortinet 19 (4.1%) Solutions Engineer concentration (top2 / mid / tail) profiles · As of 2026-11-13 PT Concentration of the 464-person Solutions Engineer pack: top two Okta+Palo Alto Networks = 378 (81.5%); mid Zscaler+CrowdStrike = 67 (14.4%); tail Fortinet = 19 (4.1%). As of 2026-11-13 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Concentration of the 464-person Solutions Engineer pack. As of 2026-11-13 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Data & notes
top two Okta+Palo Alto Networks = 378 (81.5%); mid Zscaler+CrowdStrike = 67 (14.4%); tail Fortinet = 19 (4.1%).
NameValueShare
Okta+Palo Alto Networks37881.5%
Zscaler+CrowdStrike6714.4%
Fortinet194.1%
How to use it

What it means for Solutions Engineer (464) / how to use it

This week open the named-list ask on Okta: 258/464 (55.6%) — the largest bench first.

What is in-scope for this seat?

What is in-scope for this seat?

As of 2026-11-13 PT · Source: Metix AI

Notes & method

Methodology

The count is current Solutions Engineer profiles on one company's exclusive homepage record at 2026-11-13 PT. The pack total adds five non-overlapping company records. Source: Metix AI.

Aggregate report · no personal information shown · provided by Metix AI
FAQ

FAQ

Why these five companies for the Okta-led Solutions Engineer pack (464)?
These five were counted because each has its own company record for Solutions Engineer. 464 is the five-record total on 2026-11-13 PT.
Are the other titles in the Solutions Engineer total of 464?
The total excludes Sales Engineer and Solutions Architect. The 464 is current Solutions Engineer only, as of 2026-11-13 PT.
Why do the two ends of the Solutions Engineer pack (464) differ?
The rule is identical: Okta 258, Fortinet 19. As of 2026-11-13 PT, the difference is depth, not a second definition.
Can this Solutions Engineer seat (464) be reused?
464 on 2026-11-13 PT is the published pack. Another company can be counted on the same Solutions Engineer wording.

Request the solutions engineering peer pack (five names · 464 current people)

Ask for the named list when this scope matches the search. The scope line is the whole request.

Optional: try Mira
中文版