How do Microsoft alumni split, and who penetrates most?
Wire mix first, then share of each destination bench. Penetration lead Palo Alto Networks at 2.8%.
Data & notes
| Name | Value | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks | 514 | 55.4% |
| CrowdStrike | 230 | 24.8% |
| Zscaler | 183 | 19.7% |
Read the lead wire and penetration
Ask for people on the measured wires, not a broader uncut list. Keep the title family this page counted.
Key takeaway · How to cite
Data & notes
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks | 2.8 |
| CrowdStrike | 2.5 |
| Zscaler | 2.1 |
Palo Alto Networks: 514 people
Ranked by wire headcount, as of 2026-10-31 PT.
Data & notes
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks | 514 |
| CrowdStrike | 230 |
| Zscaler | 183 |
Which talent-flow paths leave Microsoft?
The cut requires both: current at the destination, previously at Microsoft. Titles are not filtered on this page.
Data & notes
| Source | Destination | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Palo Alto Networks | 514 |
| Microsoft | CrowdStrike | 230 |
| Microsoft | Zscaler | 183 |
Absolute vs penetration: Palo Alto Networks vs Palo Alto Networks
The two rankings can diverge: volume and density are different decisions.
Data & notes
| Category | People on wire | Share of bench % |
|---|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks | 514 | 2.8 |
| CrowdStrike | 230 | 2.5 |
| Zscaler | 183 | 2.1 |
Where does Microsoft talent flow? Wire vs destination bench
Read the ledger first, as of 2026-10-31 PT. The wire and the bench are two different numbers.
| Destination | On the wire | Destination bench | Share of bench |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks | 514 | 18,339 | 2.8% |
| CrowdStrike | 230 | 9,362 | 2.5% |
| Zscaler | 183 | 8,621 | 2.1% |
Get the named list of people on these Microsoft wires
Use this page's scope if you want the named list. The scope line is the whole request.
What it means for Microsoft flow: what to do this week / how to use it
Palo Alto Networks leads both absolute and penetration (514, 2.8%) — work that wire first.
- Use the other destinations as contrast narrow lists; wire sum 927.
- Keep the ask inside: current at a measured destination and previously at Microsoft.
Cut stays on Microsoft → measured destinations
The cut requires both: current at the destination, previously at Microsoft. Titles are not filtered on this page. Destinations not listed here were not measured. As of 2026-10-31 PT.
As of 2026-10-31 PT · Source: Metix AI
Notes & method
Methodology
The wire counts people current at the destination and previously at Microsoft. The destination bench is everyone current there, as of 2026-10-31 PT. Metix AI is the source.
FAQ
- Who is counted on the Microsoft into Palo Alto Networks wire?
- People on the wire are current at Palo Alto Networks and were previously at Microsoft. 2026-10-31 PT is the date, and the lead wire is 514.
- Is the bench the same as the wire for Microsoft into Palo Alto Networks?
- The bench (18,339) is not the wire (514). Use 18,339 as the destination denominator.
- Who is the Microsoft into Palo Alto Networks list for?
- Recruiters use it to find people now at Palo Alto Networks who came from Microsoft. The lead destination on this page is Palo Alto Networks.
- What date is the Microsoft into Palo Alto Networks cut?
- Read every wire as of 2026-10-31 PT. Metix AI is the source of these wires.
Request the Microsoft feeder list
A named list can follow this page once the scope is right. Leave the companies and the spelled-out titles as they are.
Optional: try Mira