All reports
Vendor bench · TA leader

database systems vendors Software Engineer vendor bench

For TA leaders: MongoDB 870 vs Neo4j 210 current software engineer; four-vendor database systems vendors bench 1,266, 2026-11-03 PT. Tail: Cockroach Labs 26.

As-of 2026-11-03 PT Published by Metix AI Collection series
Vendor depth

Which vendor has the deepest Software Engineer bench? MongoDB at 870

Ranked by current Software Engineer, as of 2026-11-03 PT. Total 1,266 across 4 vendors.

MongoDB Neo4j ClickHouse Cockroach Labs 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 870 210 160 26 Current Software Engineer by vendor people · As of 2026-11-03 PT MongoDB Neo4j ClickHouse Cockroach Labs 0 300 600 900 870 210 160 26 Current Software Engineer by vendor people · As of 2026-11-03 PT Current Software Engineer on each vendor record: MongoDB 870; Neo4j 210; ClickHouse 160; Cockroach Labs 26. As of 2026-11-03 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Current Software Engineer on each vendor record. As of 2026-11-03 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Data & notes
MongoDB 870; Neo4j 210; ClickHouse 160; Cockroach Labs 26.
NameValue
MongoDB870
Neo4j210
ClickHouse160
Cockroach Labs26
Named list

Read vendor depth and concentration

The named list covers the companies and titles on this page. The request stays inside the companies and titles on this page.

Key takeaway · How to cite
VendorCurrent Software EngineerShare of bench
MongoDB87068.7%
Neo4j21016.6%
ClickHouse16012.6%
Cockroach Labs262.1%
Named list

Get the named database systems vendors Software Engineer vendor list

Ask for the named list when this scope matches the search. The request stays inside the companies and titles on this page.

Depth and share

MongoDB leads, but how concentrated is the bench?

The top two are 85.3%; the tail is Cockroach Labs at 26. Prefer the lead this week; keep the second as control.

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 68.7% 16.6% 12.6% MongoDB 870 (68.7%) Neo4j 210 (16.6%) ClickHouse 160 (12.6%) Cockroach Labs 26 (2.1%) Share of the database systems vendors vendor bench people · As of 2026-11-03 PT 0% 30% 60% 90% 68.7% 16.6% MongoDB 870 (68.7%) Neo4j 210 (16.6%) ClickHouse 160 (12.6%) Cockroach Labs 26 (2.1%) Share of the database systems vendors vendor bench people · As of 2026-11-03 PT Each vendor's share of the 1,266-profile bench: MongoDB 870; Neo4j 210; ClickHouse 160; Cockroach Labs 26. As of 2026-11-03 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Each vendor's share of the 1,266-profile bench. As of 2026-11-03 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Data & notes
MongoDB 870; Neo4j 210; ClickHouse 160; Cockroach Labs 26.
NameValueShare
MongoDB87068.7%
Neo4j21016.6%
ClickHouse16012.6%
Cockroach Labs262.1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 85.3% 12.6% MongoDB+Neo4j 1,080 (85.3%) ClickHouse 160 (12.6%) Cockroach Labs 26 (2.1%) database systems vendors: concentration (top2 / mid / tail) profiles · As of 2026-11-03 PT 0% 30% 60% 90% 85.3% MongoDB+Neo4j 1,080 (85.3%) ClickHouse 160 (12.6%) Cockroach Labs 26 (2.1%) database systems vendors: concentration (top2 / mid / tail) profiles · As of 2026-11-03 PT Concentration of the 1,266-profile bench. Top two MongoDB+Neo4j = 1,080 (85.3%); mid ClickHouse = 160 (12.6%); tail Cockroach Labs = 26 (2.1%). As of 2026-11-03 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Concentration of the 1,266-profile bench. As of 2026-11-03 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Data & notes
Top two MongoDB+Neo4j = 1,080 (85.3%); mid ClickHouse = 160 (12.6%); tail Cockroach Labs = 26 (2.1%).
NameValueShare
MongoDB+Neo4j1,08085.3%
ClickHouse16012.6%
Cockroach Labs262.1%
Depth vs share

MongoDB: absolute depth vs share

Absolute and share leads can differ; here the lead is MongoDB.

MongoDB Neo4j ClickHouse Cockroach Labs 0 300 600 900 1,200 870 210 160 26 68.7 16.6 12.6 2.1 Current profiles Share of bench % database systems vendors: vendor depth vs share As of 2026-11-03 PT MongoDB Neo4j ClickHouse Cockroach Labs 0 500 1,000 870 210 160 26 68.7 16.6 12.6 2.1 Current profiles Share of bench % database systems vendors: vendor depth vs share As of 2026-11-03 PT Absolute depth and share diverge across MongoDB, Neo4j, ClickHouse, Cockroach Labs; lead MongoDB at 870. As of 2026-11-03 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Absolute depth and share diverge across MongoDB, Neo4j, ClickHouse, Cockroach Labs; lead MongoDB at 870. As of 2026-11-03 PT. Source: Metix AI.
Data & notes
CategoryCurrent profilesShare of bench %
MongoDB87068.7
Neo4j21016.6
ClickHouse16012.6
Cockroach Labs262.1
How to use it

What it means for database systems vendors Software Engineer vendor bench / how to use it

Cut and unmeasured

Cut stays on measured database systems vendors vendors

The cut is current Software Engineer counted on each vendor's own record; each vendor needs at least 12 profiles. The total sums included vendors, not company headcount. Vendors not listed here were not measured. As of 2026-11-03 PT.

As of 2026-11-03 PT · Source: Metix AI

Notes & method

Methodology

Vendor cells are current Software Engineer on each company's own record, dated 2026-11-03 PT. The inclusion floor is 12 profiles per vendor; the total adds the included cells. Metix AI is the source.

Aggregate report · no personal information shown · provided by Metix AI
FAQ

FAQ

Who is counted in the database systems vendors vendor bench?
Each cell is current Software Engineer profiles on that vendor's own homepage record, as of 2026-11-03 PT. The inclusion floor is 12 profiles per vendor.
Is the database systems vendors total company headcount?
It adds the vendor cells; it is not a headcount claim about any one company. The largest cell is MongoDB with 870.
Who uses the database systems vendors vendor bench?
Use it when the choice is which vendor bench to hire from. The stack on this page is database systems vendors.
Where do the database systems vendors figures come from?
Read the bench as of 2026-11-03 PT. Published by Metix AI.

Request the database systems vendors Software Engineer vendor list

The named list covers the companies and titles on this page. The request stays inside the companies and titles on this page.

Optional: try Mira
Database systems vendor classification
Database systems vendor classification
Database systems vendor contrast
Database systems vendor contrast
中文版