Peer postings in the published Discovery Loop map number 264. They are openings at peer companies, not the 594 lineage-covered people and not a vacancy rate. Founder capabilities remain 4 on the sibling page.
Request the list behind this cut
264 peer postings. The named list stays on this ask; the parent map holds the full cut.
Published figures
| Measure | Figure |
|---|---|
| Peer postings | 264 |
| Lineage-covered talent | 594 |
| Founder capabilities | 4 |
Source: Jeff Dean leaves Google, revealing AI’s next talent gap · Metix AI · report date 2026-08-08
Scope and limits
- Public profiles may contain update lags, self-presentation bias, and inconsistent titles.
- Figures are a visible sample for relative comparison. They are not official headcount and are not used to estimate a global workforce.
Back to Jeff Dean leaves Google, revealing AI’s next talent gap
FAQ
Is 264 a vacancy rate?
No. It is a count of peer postings.
Are the 264 people?
No. The people count is 594 lineage-covered talent.
What date is on the parent?
Report date 2026-08-08.
Is this a job-market forecast?
No. It is the published peer-posting count.
Where is the method, and how do I cite this figure?
The method page is https://metix.ai/reports/methodology. Cite this answer with this page’s URL https://metix.ai/reports/questions/discovery-loop-peer-postings. The parent map is https://metix.ai/reports/mapping/ai-next-talent-gap-2026. Report date 2026-08-08.
How to cite
Metix AI. (2026). How many peer postings are in the Discovery Loop map? Metix AI Talent Intelligence. https://metix.ai/reports/questions/discovery-loop-peer-postings
Ask Metix AI to map this cut
Open a Metix AI hiring workspace on the same published cut.
Start a Mira trial