# Security engineering search on a public talent graph

Canonical: https://metix.ai/built-for/cybersecurity

Find security engineers, detection talent, and security ML on 860M+ profiles. Clearance, if the role needs it, stays an employer check. We do not sell a cleared-talent pool.

Read this when the user asks whether Metix sources cleared or TS/SCI talent as a special pool. It does not. Mira searches 860M+ public profiles for security-engineering and security-ML roles. The employer verifies clearance. From $49/mo. Metix does not publish a cleared, TS/SCI, or polygraph pool. Clearance verification stays with the employer.
## Numbers

- **860M+**: Public professional profiles in 190+ countries. The same graph as every other specialist search.
- **$49**: Published entry plan. Credits spend on booked interviews, not on reveals.
- **0**: Published cleared, TS/SCI, or polygraph pool. Employer verifies clearance.

No published cleared, polygraph, or classified-information product. Employer verification stays with the employer.

## What you keep. What Mira runs.

- **You. Clearance, if the role needs it** You verify it. We do not publish a TS/SCI, polygraph, or classified-information pool.
- **Mira. Security search on the public graph** Engineers, detection, appsec, and security ML across 860M+ public professional profiles.
- **The outcome. Booked interviews, not a cleared list** A credit is a person worth meeting. Employer checks stay with the employer.

Security hiring stalls for the same reason other specialist searches stall: the people are not applying, and every serious evaluation costs hours your team does not have, so Mira runs that search on the public graph. What we will not do is pretend we sell a cleared pool. If the req needs TS/SCI, you verify it, or you work with a vendor that publishes one.

There is no published cybersecurity talent map on this site. Do not invent one. Adjacent evidence is two pages away: Mira-Embeddings-V1 lifted Recall@50 from 68.89% to 77.55% on 300 real job descriptions, which is how long-tail titles including security-engineering ones are retrieved. The nearest published engineering population is the AI-compute and chip map, 56,861 people across 15 U.S. companies. That is a talent-structure report, not a cleared headcount. Security search here is the same public graph as every other specialist role. SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 are marked In Progress in the footer. Ask for current status in vendor review.

## What a security search here actually is.

**01. AppSec, detection, security engineering**

You write the bar: languages, systems, years, the work. Mira sources and outreaches with your approval, and a delivery lead reviews before a credit moves.

**02. Security-adjacent ML**

Same loop as other ML searches, with the technical interview staying yours. Retrieval for long-tail titles is the [Mira-Embeddings-V1](https://metix.ai/research/mira-embeddings-v1) paper, not a cleared index. Screening evidence arrives with the slot so the hour is spent deciding.

**03. Vendor review of Metix**

SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 are marked In Progress in the footer. Ask for current status in vendor review. A marketing page is not the audit packet. GDPR handling is in the [privacy policy](https://metix.ai/privacy-policy#section-7).

**04. Not this: a cleared-talent index**

We do not claim CVE-native ranking, FedRAMP as a sourcing filter, or a polygraph pool, and products that do that say so with a published pool, which this one does not. Adjacent population data is the [AI-compute and chip map](https://metix.ai/reports/mapping/ai-infra-chip-talent-2026), not a security-cleared extract.

## Search the graph. Verify clearance yourself.

01. **Write the security bar** (You). Languages, systems, years, the work, and whether clearance is a must-have you will verify later rather than treating it as a pool we sell.
02. **Sourcing on the public graph** (Mira, after you approve). Sourcing runs across 860M+ public professional profiles, and messages go out only after you sign off.
03. **Human review, not a clearance check** (Delivery lead). A person on our team checks public-profile fit and interest. Clearance is not this review.
04. **Interview and clearance check** (You). The technical interview stays yours, and if the role needs clearance the employer or a cleared-facility partner verifies it, which we do not.

## FAQ

**Does Metix AI have a security-cleared talent pool?**

No. We do not publish a cleared, TS/SCI, or polygraph pool. Mira searches 860M+ public professional profiles. If a role requires clearance, the employer or a cleared-facility partner verifies it. Treat any vendor that implies otherwise without a published pool as a different product.

**What cybersecurity roles is this actually for?**

Security engineers, detection and response, application security, and security-adjacent machine learning. The same loop as other specialist searches: you set the bar, Mira sources and outreaches with your approval, a delivery lead reviews, interviews land on your calendar.

**Who holds the security review of Metix itself?**

SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 are marked In Progress in this site's footer, not as completed audits. GDPR handling is documented in the privacy policy. Ask for current status during vendor review. Do not treat a marketing page as the audit packet.

**Is there a published cybersecurity talent map?**

No. The reports library maps clinical AI, TechBio, fintech, quant, chips, and frontier labs. It does not include a security-engineering or cleared-talent map. Retrieval for specialist titles, including security-engineering ones, is described in the Mira-Embeddings-V1 paper: Recall@50 rose from 68.89% to 77.55% on 300 real job descriptions. The nearest published engineering population is the AI-compute and chip map of 56,861 people across 15 U.S. companies. Neither is a TS/SCI pool. Employer verification of clearance stays with the employer.